.Crying.
The crying in this movie--my crying--was better than the laughing. And I mean that in the best way.
Taken from Google Images. |
* * *
Didn't start off so strong. Something about the uniform humor: unerring in punchy, nonchalant witticisms and edgy though friendly reparte. My favorite kind of humor. But unnerving when it's everyone else's too. Also, had a seriously difficult time understanding Writer, Director, and Lead Actress (whaaaa?!) Jennifer Westfeldt. Her voice is like soft-serve. But certainly becomes more audible as the film progresses. And more than certainly could just be my kick-ass (not) audio set-up.
But gradually, mirroring the pace of momentous occasions which unfurl in all of our lives, the film picked-up momentum.
Jennifer Westfeldt. Taken from Google Images. |
Here's the Twitter Play-by-Play.
(Attainable real-time ... when you follow me on Twitter.)
Beginning
Only thing: Scott/Westfield kid looks like how my lil bro looked. TOOOOOO CUTE. #FriendsWithKids
Everyone has the same personality/sense of humor. Worked in #AnchorMan not in #FriendsWithKids . #butimstillwatching
Transitioning
Alright. Movies getting good. #FriendsWithKids #family
Getting so good. #FriendsWithKids #playbyplay
Boom
MOVIE IS SO GOOD #FriendsWithKids #tears
BEST MOVIE EVERRRRRRRRRR. When fuck the shit out of you becomes romantic. #FriendsWithKids #stilltears OMG SO GOOD.
Post Script
(Misspelled writer/director/lead actor's name. ...Not ideal.)
The good tweets. |
Let me take you through my key moments which elicited ... tears.
1. Casting: Annoying at first that Adam Scott seems so mismatched with Westfeldt whose character feels older due to maturity. Enlightening once you realize it was a purposeful initial-mismatch to--again--mirror real life.
Also refreshing that Kirsten Wiig isn't center-stage. Not because we don't want her to be, but rather, because she delivers such an authentic supporting character in a less-than-comedic-&-way-more-dramatic-role. Versatility. Love.
2. Plot: Not predictable. I don't care what you think you know. Real. Real. Real. Real. In my minuscule experiences--compared to these characters'--the ebbs & flows of this friendship feels genuine. The difference between: that actually/really does happen & I want that so badly to happen.
3. Rom-Com: Like these only when they're heavier on the com than the rom. This one has the balance so articulately married, it's like coco & cinnamon with a steak or champagne & citrus in a cake.
4. Realism: Plot--what you read on IDMb or back of blue-ray--is far-fetched: 2 bff having a baby & raising it as just-friends to avoid pitfalls of marriage. ...Excuse me? But theme--underlying story-line which unites all characters--is real life: marriages which struggle because of children, maybe fall apart because they were shallow; relationships with struggle because of children, maybe fall apart because they are shallow; marriages & relationships which grow painstakingly and slowly over time because of difficult self-realizations.
Shit's so real, I cried. Alright. Two different parts.
5. Originality: Not just in plot. Or how film was able to turn rom-com, with craycray plot, into realistic story. But, also, in its delivery of romanticism.
I want to (or maybe it was I need to or maybe let me ... no matter) "fuck the shit out of you." When a film makes that romantic. Genuinely romantic. You-are-crying-right-now-romantic. You-believe-it-romantic. When a film does that ... Genius. GENIUS WESTFELDT. Genius.
Best romantic-comedy I've ever watched. Because I don't count Anchorman as romantic. ...But even if I did, Friends With Kids would still probably win.
* * *
Haven't had a boyfriend in almost 4 years. Film refocuses me. Gives me hope. Not false hope. Like go-like-best-guy-friend or re-like-loser-I-got-over. Rather: Like it's okay to be late-30's & still not know. I can live with that. ... Although, should probably land a few boyfriends between now & then.
xoxo.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Not your typical BarbaraEllen ... but still be constructive. Creative also welcome! xo.